Solid State Logic’s UF1 DAW Control Centre in the Competitive Landscape

image credit: Solid State Logic

Solid State Logic (SSL) recently unveiled the UF1 DAW Control Centre, a compact single fader controller designed to enhance music production by providing comprehensive control over digital audio workstation (DAW) environments. With the UF1, SSL aims to streamline the workflow and bridge the gap between the artist and their tools. In this article, we will compare the UF1 with other notable players in the market, focusing on features, integration, and pricing.

SSL UF1 DAW Control Centre:

The UF1 boasts a single 100mm motorized fader, dual high-resolution displays, soft rubber keys, and a weighted jog wheel. It also comes in a robust metal chassis. With the capability to control pans, sends, plug-ins, and more, UF1 offers customization with 46 soft keys tailored to the user’s workflow. UF1 can control up to three DAWs simultaneously and supports integration with major DAWs including Pro Tools, Logic, Cubase, Studio One, Ableton Live, LUNA, and Pyramix. The dual high-resolution displays provide visual feedback of track names, parameters, time display, and more. Additionally, UF1 includes a perpetual license for the SSL Meter plug-in.

How Does the UF1 Stack Up Against the Rest?:

PreSonus FaderPort:

PreSonus FaderPort is a single-channel USB MIDI controller. While it is compact like the UF1, it features a single touch-sensitive, 100 mm long-throw, motorized fader and a 360-degree push-button encoder. It also integrates with major DAWs but lacks the dual high-resolution displays that the UF1 offers. The FaderPort offers transport controls but lacks the weighted jog wheel present in UF1. Also, the FaderPort does not offer as many customizable keys as the UF1.

Behringer X-TOUCH ONE:

Behringer X-TOUCH ONE is another competitor in the single-fader controller category. Like the UF1, it features a 100mm motorized fader, a jog wheel, and rotary controls. However, it lacks dual high-resolution displays and does not offer as much customization. The build quality of the X-TOUCH ONE is considered to be less robust compared to the UF1’s metal chassis.

Avid Artist Mix:

The Avid Artist Mix is more extensive than the UF1, featuring eight touch-sensitive motorized faders. While this provides more control for mixing, it is bulkier and less portable than the UF1. The Artist Mix integrates well with Pro Tools but may not offer the same level of integration with other DAWs compared to UF1. It also lacks the dual high-resolution displays of the UF1.

The SSL UF1 DAW Control Centre stands out among its peers with its dual high-resolution displays, extensive customization options, and robust build quality. While alternatives like PreSonus FaderPort and Behringer X-TOUCH ONE offer similar functionalities, they do not match the UF1’s comprehensive control and integration capabilities. The Avid Artist Mix offers more faders but lacks the portability and high-resolution displays of the UF1. For artists and producers looking for a compact, feature-rich single fader controller, the SSL UF1 DAW Control Centre is a compelling choice.

Solid State Logic

PreSonus FaderPort

Behringer X-TOUCH ONE

Avid Artist Mix

Get The TKT1957 Tech Newsletter

Tech brief:

- Reviews

- Comparative analysis

- News of technologies and software solutions

We don’t spam!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments